Manila: Some flood control-related graft cases filed before the Sandiganbayan have already reached the defense stage in less than a year, a development senators said should strengthen the government's push for swift accountability in corruption cases. During the Senate hearing on the Judiciary's proposed 2027 budget, Sandiganbayan Presiding Justice Geraldine Faith Econg said the first batch of flood control cases filed by the Office of the Ombudsman on Nov. 18, 2025, is already moving through trial.
According to Philippines News Agency, Justice Econg confirmed to senators that the first of these cases has reached the defense stage within a year, highlighting the rapid progress. Senate President Win Gatchalian inquired about the number of cases filed, to which Econg responded that there are 26 cases involving senators and congressmen. While one case was archived due to an unlocatable accused, others have proceeded to the defense stage, promising a potential resolution soon, contingent upon evidence presentation and court disposition.
Econg mentioned that if proceedings adhere to the rules on speedy trial, resolutions might occur within the year, whether through conviction or acquittal. Senator Joseph Victor 'JV' Ejercito emphasized the importance of this progress for restoring public trust after the flood control controversy. He stated, "People are waiting for actions," reinforcing the significance of swift justice in combating corruption and restoring faith in governance.
Econg further noted that timely trials enable a fair and comprehensive presentation of evidence, as witnesses remain available and their memories fresh. Delays, she warned, could weaken cases due to witness unavailability or external pressures. The Sandiganbayan's caseload has decreased significantly to 525 from 1,229 in 2024, with an improved conviction rate of 82.48 percent, illustrating enhanced efficiency.
In the same Senate hearing, Gatchalian opposed a Department of Budget and Management (DBM) recommendation to cut the Sandiganbayan's funding by PHP551 million. He argued that reducing the anti-graft court's budget would be counterproductive, especially when it requires more resources to manage the increasing number of cases effectively.
Justice Econg expressed gratitude for Gatchalian's support. She explained the need for increased funding, particularly for constructing Sandiganbayan Building 2, due to safety concerns at the current facility. The existing building's proximity to a fault line poses significant risks, necessitating a safer environment for all court users. Econg also highlighted the need for additional space, as the current building's capacity issues force divisions to share courtrooms.
