Search
Close this search box.

PBBM Supports Supreme Court’s Call for Anti-Dynasty Law Legislation

Manila: President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. has expressed support for the Supreme Court's (SC) call for Congress to enact a law prohibiting political dynasties, Malaca±ang announced. Presidential Communications Office Undersecretary Claire Castro emphasized that the anti-political dynasty bill is among the administration's priority measures.

According to Philippines News Agency, Castro highlighted President Marcos's determination to see the measure passed into law during his term. "Alam na po natin na ito po ang isa sa mga priority bills ng Pangulo. Talagang ito po ay pinapamadali niya at gusto po niya hangga't maaari sa panahon po niya ay maipasa ang anti-political dynasty law (We already know that this is one of the President's priority bills. He is really pushing for its passage, and he wants the anti-political dynasty law to be enacted, if possible, during his term)," Castro stated.

Castro further affirmed the President's agreement with the Supreme Court's decision, advocating for legislation on political dynasties. When questioned about the progress of the measure, particularly in the Senate, Castro expressed that the timeline for its passage rests with Congress. She acknowledged the numerous responsibilities and legislative priorities that lawmakers manage, which may contribute to delays.

"Ang nais lang ipaalam ng Pangulo ay gusto po niya itong maipasa (What the President wants to make clear is that he wants it to be passed)," Castro noted, adding that lawmakers are also cognizant of the SC's stance and share the desire to enact an anti-political dynasty law.

The Supreme Court has urged Congress to fulfill its constitutional obligation to enact a law prohibiting political dynasties promptly. In its ruling on August 26, the SC underscored that Article II, Section 26 of the 1987 Constitution mandates the State to ensure equal access to opportunities for public service and prohibit political dynasties as defined by law. The SC highlighted that Congress's prolonged failure to pass such a law for 39 years represents a grave abuse of discretion.