Ex-CJ Justice Puno bats for ‘hybrid’ con-con for cha-cha

Former Supreme Court Chief Justice Reynato Puno recently pushed for a "hybrid" type of constitutional convention that would amend the Constitution and pave the way for a change into a federal system of government.

Speaking at the Forum on Federalism sponsored by the Development Academy of the Philippines' Council of Fellows at the Virata Hall of DAP Pasig, Puno said such a type of con-con would see delegates being elected at large and a select group of legislator representatives being appointed by Congress to the body that would decide changes in the Constitution.

Such changes would enable the country to shift from a highly centralized form of government into a federal system, as proposed by various quarters, including President Duterte himself, former Senate President Aquilino "Nene" Pimentel Jr., who along with Puno was the main speaker in the forum that also served as an occasion for the conferment of their membership to the DAP Council of Fellows.

Method of amendment

Puno, who spoke on the judicial system in federalism, appeared to favor a method of constitutional amendment different from that of a constituent assembly, where Congress itself and appointed representatives would convene to undertake the amendments, or a people's initiative.

Puno's "hybrid" method in constituting the body, however, would include elements from both a con-con and a con-ass, which is a group made up of members of Congress joining delegates elected in a con-con.

The former Chief Justice stressed that "uniformity of thought cannot be imposed on diverse cultures" as Filipinos have, saying that which plagues the Philippines is "our multi-cultural reality that colonizers and imperial Manila tried in vain to overcome" through economic control and an educational system that promoted one culture and religion as superior over all others.

Puno also discussed other models of federalism, including the federal-presidential form as exemplified by the United States, which Pimentel himself favors, and the French federal-parliamentary model that Duterte on the other hand prefers.

Under the US model, the supremacy of the constitution is recognized. The government is also divided into the executive, legislative and judicial branches under a system of checks and balances.

Under the French model, a constitutional council is integrated with the legislature, previewing proposed laws prior to their enactment. The High Court also acts as the Commission on Elections and provides opinions on constitutionality issues and their conformity with foreign policy.

Source: Daily Tribune

Related posts